Skip to content

Upheal vs Blueprint

Two of the AI therapy scribes we track, compared on the dimensions that actually determine fit: clinical note quality, compliance, EHR integration and pricing.

Reviewed by TherapyScribes EditorialFacts verified Methodology

Key takeaways

  • Upheal starts at Free up to 10 sessions/mo; from $59/mo; Blueprint starts at From $79/clinician/mo.
  • HIPAA: Upheal — Yes; Blueprint — Yes.
  • Note formats: Upheal — SOAP, DAP, BIRP, GIRP, Narrative, Custom; Blueprint — SOAP, DAP, BIRP, Narrative, Custom.
  • Regions: Upheal — US, UK, EU, CA, ANZ; Blueprint — US.

Side-by-side

Upheal vs Blueprint feature comparison
Feature
Upheal logoUpheal
Blueprint logoBlueprint
Editorial score8.7 / 108.2 / 10
StatusHands-on testedHands-on tested
Starting priceFree up to 10 sessions/mo; from $59/moFrom $79/clinician/mo
Free tierYesNo
Free trial14 days
HIPAA + BAAYesYes
SOC 2YesYes
GDPRYes
42 CFR Part 2
Note formatsSOAP, DAP, BIRP, GIRP, Narrative, CustomSOAP, DAP, BIRP, Narrative, Custom
Languages41
RegionsUS, UK, EU, CA, ANZUS
EHR integrations32
Founded20222019
HQPrague, Czech Republic · New York, USANew York, NY, USA
8.7/10

Upheal

Therapy-first AI scribe with progress-note and treatment-plan templates

Built for therapy from day one rather than retrofitted from a generic medical scribe. SOAP, DAP, BIRP, GIRP and a handful of therapy-specific templates ship out of the box, treatment-plan drafting is genuinely useful, and telehealth capture works inside the same browser session as the call. HIPAA-aligned with a BAA, audio is not retained by default once the note is generated, and the company states it does not train models on customer session data. Pricing is published and starts with a real free tier rather than a 7-day trial. The main trade-off is depth of EHR integration: writing back into SimplePractice / TherapyNotes is mostly copy-paste today.

Read the full Upheal review →
8.2/10

Blueprint

Measurement-based care platform with an ambient AI note layer

Distinct from a pure scribe — Blueprint started as a measurement-based-care platform and now ships an ambient note layer that ties session content to outcome measures (PHQ-9, GAD-7, etc.). Useful if you want one tool for both. HIPAA-aligned with BAA. Pricing is published per-clinician with a free trial. Note quality is solid on standard talk-therapy formats; specialty templates are narrower than Mentalyc or Upheal.

Read the full Blueprint review →

Bottom line

Pick Upheal if you need private-practice therapists who want progress notes in their preferred format with minimal cleanup. Pick Blueprint if you need therapists who want progress notes plus measurement-based-care outcomes in one workflow. Verify on a live session before committing — both publish trials or free tiers worth using.

FAQ

Which is better, Upheal or Blueprint?

On our editorial rubric, Upheal scores higher (8.7 vs 8.2). Best fit depends on your country, EHR, and budget — see the side-by-side table above.

Is Upheal cheaper than Blueprint?

Upheal starts at Free up to 10 sessions/mo; from $59/mo; Blueprint starts at From $79/clinician/mo.

Are both Upheal and Blueprint HIPAA-compliant?

Upheal's HIPAA stance is "yes"; Blueprint's is "yes" as of our last verification.

Which note formats do Upheal and Blueprint support?

Upheal: SOAP, DAP, BIRP, GIRP, Narrative, Custom. Blueprint: SOAP, DAP, BIRP, Narrative, Custom.

Do Upheal or Blueprint integrate with SimplePractice or TherapyNotes?

Upheal has 3 published EHR integration(s); Blueprint has 2. Most therapy scribes today use copy-paste rather than native write-back.

Other comparisons